Essay 10-Difference and Change
Introduction
In essay 7 we have
introduced the definition of object, and there is an implicit statement of
plurality of objects. However, there is no explicit statement of it. In essay 6,
we have established the grounds for any form of observation, that the existence
of objects is proven by our conscious experience of such objects. Therefore,
based on the implicit statement of plurality and the grounds of observation,
this essay shall seek to explore the observations of difference and change.
Difference
The experience of
difference is an experience ubiquitous to our regular lives. However, it is a
bit difficult to properly define difference other than, “not the same.”
Unfortunately, difference is by essence a negation of the other object, if we
have A and B, B is different from A because within B there is a negation of A’s
form, not necessarily the antithesis but the lack of A, or something which is
not A. In short, B is B because it is not A, nor is it anything else, it is
itself.
We can explore the
concept of category just a bit or the Platonic form. Two objects are different
when they do not share the same form or category. Notice how once more we have
to define difference as negation of a concept which is “same”. However, we can
define this same as more or less, “one form.” As such, we can at least define
difference as the condition where objects do not share one form.
Change
Change is related to
difference, it is the process in which things become different, or not same, or
become something else which is not itself. However, when we say that A has
changed to B, when A is there, is B present? Or when B is there, is A present?
That is one of the mysteries that we shall explore in this section. Change is
also ubiquitous, some even say that everything changes except for change
itself, in short simply saying, “Change is constant.”
Yet what is the true
nature of change? We can first observe the phenomenon of change. Let us imagine
a log of wood being burned into ashes. When we observe the log, the ashes are
not there, and when we observe the ashes, the log is not there. This gives us a
starting point, that change might be the change of existence. However, from a
beginning standpoint we know that that cannot be true.
From essay
8
we have known that the ashes are contained within the log as the log has the
capacity to be turned into ashes. As such this informs us that there was no
change of existence of the ashes from the observation of the log to the
observation of the ashes. Instead there is only one change that is the change
of phenomenon or conscious experience. Therefore, we may say that change is actually
the change of conscious experience only and not the change of existence.
This is not to say that
change cannot be the change of existence, but if we analyse the beginning of a
phenomenon, it has to be the change of phenomenon and not the change of
existence. While from the end, the end of existence is a possibility, but we do
not discuss that in this essay. What this means is that the process of change
is essentially the process of objects entering and exiting the region of
conscious experience. Therefore, this is the phenomenal concept of change, as
opposed to the existential concept of change.
Dynamic Property
All objects which can
change, that is enter and exit the conscious experience, have a unique kind of
property that is the dynamic property. The dynamic property is a set of 3
properties which are related to the change of the object. These properties are
the dynamic property, the causal property, and the destination property. The
dynamic property is what allows the object to change at all, the causal
property is the conditions required for change, and the destination property is
the object which is the result of the change.
Let us use again the
example of the ashes and the log. The cause of the log’s change to ashes is
possibly fire, and the destination of the log are ashes. Meanwhile the dynamic
property simply means that the log can change. Let us take a more abstract
example of a mathematical function. Any value within that function can possibly
be the output of a previous operation and be an input for the next operation
producing a new value. The cause of that middle value is then the operation of
the previous value, and the new value is the destination of that middle value.
The dynamic property simply means that such objects that are functions are
possible.
Together, the dynamic
property can tell us exactly how an object changes in a single historical
narrative from the causes of the change to the results of the change. The dynamic
properties of many objects allow us to formulate patterns of change and see the
function behind the change. With that function we can predict objects not just
one object at a time but many objects at once as science has done. The dynamic
property, whether we know it or not, is the basis of all physical laws and
patterns.
The concept of the
dynamic property connects us back to the true nature of change as the change of
phenomenon. As the dynamic property
shows that the destination object is already contained within the original
object of change within the destination property. Meanwhile, the original
object is contained within the destination property of its causes. Therefore,
all objects already exist, what changes is only their relationship to conscious
experience, it either is inside or outside of experience.
Phenomenal Change
We have established that
change is essentially phenomenal, it is the change of the conscious experience
and not the change of existence. However, this gives rise to an interesting but
fatal implication that is there is no change when there is no conscious experience.
In one way this is true, in the total lack of a conscious experience there
would be no difference between having change and having no change.
However, science has
shown that events, that is changes, occurring outside of our experience can
affect and change things within our own experience. As such the notion that
change is not present at all outside of conscious experience becomes
questionable. Then again, we know that change cannot be a change of existence,
nor can it only be a change of conscious experience. We must introduce a 3rd
variable, that is actuality.
Actuality can be roughly
interpreted as the field of conscious potentiality. What it means is it is the
parts of reality that our consciousness can access at any given amount of time.
In relation to objects, actuality is also the region of reality where objects
can change and affect each other. Therefore, the changes of an object are not
the object entering conscious actuality but conscious potentiality. Conscious
actuality here refers to the actual consciousness, the conscious experience as
it is, while conscious potentiality refers to what can be part of consciousness
at any given time.
This resolves the issue
as change still does not affect the existence of objects, it only affects their
relationship with conscious experience, from being unable to enter experience
to being able to enter experience. There is another possible solution of
introducing an omnipresent and omniscient being, but that does not actually
resolve the issue. What we need is to prove that change can exist outside of
conscious experience, and actuality serves as the perfect solution.
Conclusions
We obtain several
philosophical statements from this essay that is, “Difference is the
condition in which objects do not share one form,” “Change is the
process of objects entering and exiting actuality,” “Dynamic property is
the property of an object related to its change,” “Dynamic property is
composed of dynamic property, causal property, and destination property,” “Dynamic
property is the property that enables an object to change,” “Causal
property is the object before the object at hand and the objects required to
change the object,” “Destination property is the object resulted from
the change of an object,” and, “Actuality is the region of reality
accessible to conscious experience at any given time.” In the next essay we
shall summarize the concepts of existence and formulate a definition of
existence. For now this essay is declared to be done.
This essay corresponds to
the Indonesian
version.
Comments
Post a Comment